ITMG381
Assignment#5 AmericanMilitaryUniversity
ITMG381:CyberlawandPrivacyinaDigitalAge
Assignment#5 IntheWeatherUndergroundCorporationlawsuitthecourtshoulddeterminethatthey lackpersonaljurisdictionoverthecase.Thereasonforthisisthatthereisnoevidencetosupport theprincipleofminimumcontactswithinthestateofMichigan.Furthermore,thecourtalsodoes nothavesubjectmatterjurisdictionoverthecaseaswell.Inordertoestablishpersonal jurisdictionminimumcontactmustbemetintheforumstate.Residentswithinthestateof Michiganwouldfallundertheauthorityofthecourt.Beingthatthedefendant,Navigation CatalystSystems,Incorporated(“NCS”),isaregisteredbusinessinthestateofDelawarethis eliminatesthefirstfinding.Additionally,NCSdoesnotownoroperateanysubsidiary company’sorremotecompanieswithinthestateofMichigan.Thisisanotherfactortoconsider whenexercisingpersonaljurisdiction.InordertoclaimjurisdictionoverNCSthecompany would havetobeconductinginstateactivity.Thisconditionisalsonotmetbeingthatthereisno correlationwithNCSandthestateofMichigan.EvenifNCShasitsproductsusedwithinthe stateitwouldnotbesufficientenoughtoestablishpersonaljurisdictionwithminimumcontact.PertheInternationalShoeCo.v.Washingtoncase,itwasdeterminedthathavingproductsin commercealoneisinefficientindeterminingminimumcontacts.Thispreventsasellerofa productfrombeingsuedwithinanotherstatesdistrictcourt.Astreamingagreementisabletoofferflexiblecontenttoissubscribers.Theagreement betweenApple,IncandMajorLeagueBaseballisonethatcanbebeneficialwithintheright parameters.Oneofthebiggestadvantagestoastreamingserviceistheaccesstocontenton demand.Thisisafeaturethatisprevalentthroughoutthestreamingindustry.Consumerswould
wanttobeabletoconsumethecontentattheirleisure.Aplaybackfeatureshouldbeenabledto allowthistohappen.Thisincludespre-andpost-gameshowsandinterviews.Inadditiontoa playbackfeaturethereshouldalsobeahistoricallibraryofgamestoenhancetheuser’s experience.Historicalgamesalsoallowforcontenttobecuratedduringsignificantsporting eventscreatingamoreenjoyablesportingexperience.WiththesefeaturesaddedMLBwould alsowanttoprotecttheirdata.AlicensingagreementbetweenApplethatdeterminesthe lengthoftimeallowedforthedisplayofMLBtrademarksaswellaseventbroadcasting.The restrictionswouldalsoauthorizeorblocksubsidiariesfromusingthecontentaswell.Thiswill limitthedistributionofthecontentandpreventApple,Incfrommarketingwithoutthe expressedwrittenconsentofMLB.References InternationalShoeCo.v.Washington.(1956).TheYaleLawJournal,65(8),1138–.Peterson,T.(2010).Thetimingofminimumcontacts.TheGeorgeWashingtonLaw Review,79(1),101–.